Letter: Shakespeare sonnet beats teen novels
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I see that some teachers believe compulsory Shakespeare will 'kill the enjoyment of literature' ('Teachers angered by prospect of return to O-levels', 7 January). Last year I sat GCSE English. I studied no Shakespeare except for one sonnet, which I did out of choice. Instead, nearly all our books were written for teenagers - and said so clearly on the back. Far from enjoying this, I found it patronising, boring and impossible to study. I wrote a longer, and better, essay on a 14-line sonnet than on a novel for teenagers. If teachers will not let us read Shakespeare, the Government is right to enforce it. All my friends agree that Shakespeare is more enjoyable than what we read.
Yours,
E. HOBBS
Old Cwmbran, Gwent
7 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments