LETTER: Sex scandals have a sordid tradition
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr David Turner
Sir: Our attitudes towards sex and marriage may well have changed over time, as Professor Carol Smart suggests ("Has adultery become a spurious issue?" 22 May), but the current stance taken by the popular media in its reporting of adultery is no recent development.
From the late 17th century, notorious court cases involving sexual scandal were the subject of cheap pamphlets which seem to have sold in considerable numbers. Their publishers, like today's newspaper editors, would employ hacks to expose adulterous affairs through voyeuristic eyewitness reports and incriminating letters: the more explicit the better. By the 18th century, this form of journalism frequently verged on the pornographic, making today's tabloids seem prudish in comparison. Yet, as in the popular press today, such salacious detail was interspersed with condemnatory moralising. The exposure of the adulterers and their shameful acts was sometimes held up as the working of divine providence while also serving as a warning to readers not to fall into such depraved habits themselves.
The rhetoric of today's popular media has changed, but its blending of titillation with moral righteousness draws on a tradition dating back at least 300 years.
Yours sincerely,
DAVID TURNER
Braesnose College
Oxford
22 May
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments