Letter: Sewers policy defies logic
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE STATEMENT by Ofwat's
Director-General, Ian Byatt (Letters, 24 April), denying underspend is not supported by the water companies' published accounts, in which auditors note: 'The infrastructure renewals expenditure provision represents the unexpended balance of the profit and loss charge.' At March 1993, the unexpended balance was was pounds 278.8m.
Our members have made substantial investment decisions based on Ofwat's assurance that the shortfall we identified would not be significant by March 1995, hence our astonishment at revelations that an accrual of pounds 424m had been agreed before privatisation with government and that recent agreements allowed this to run into the 21st century.
Britain led the world in development of its infrastructure assets, and the inventiveness of our industry has until now placed us as international leaders in no-dig renovation techniques. We know that the rate of dereliction of underground assets exceeds the rate of renovation and that the recession has produced the lowest renovation costs since 1988.
Our members trade in the competitive sector, where operating profits of 5 per cent are good and where losses can occur. The regulated water companies, as monopolies, produce average operating profits of 34 per cent. Essential renovation schemes remain under continual deferment and an increasing underspend at this time defies logic and betrays the engineering skills and foresight of our forebears.
Chris Rees
Secretary
Sewer Renovation Federation
Langport, Somerset
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments