Letter: Sentencing paedophiles

Tetteh Turkson
Thursday 09 April 1998 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

I ASSUMED that all civilised people subscribed to the view that sentences should be proportionate to the offence of which the accused was convicted, not some notional propensity to commit crime in the future.

No doubt the public need protecting from paedophile offenders but this is already catered for in the Criminal Justice Act 1991 s2 (2) (b). What the Home Secretary seems to be proposing (report, 7 April) is little short of internment without trial. If a judge sets a sentence which he believes reflects the seriousness of the crime and the need to protect the public, on what grounds can that be extended?

No-one doubts that these offences are among the most heinous; few, if any, would argue with the idea of enforced continuing treatment and support for the offenders; even fewer would argue that current sentences could not be more severe.

However, let us not abandon the all-important principles on which sentencing is based. Keeping someone in prison after they have served their proper sentence is simply wrong and we do ourselves no favours if we ignore that for this year's most-hated crime.

TETTEH TURKSON

London SE5

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in