Letter: Sentence should reflect rape victim's court ordeal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: It is normal for judges passing sentence to take account of evidence of remorse on the part of the criminal, and a guilty plea is generally thought likely to be rewarded with a lighter sentence than an unsuccessful defence.
Surely it is therefore proper and just that the recent court behaviour of a rapist who subjected his victim to a six-day ordeal in the witness box, which most people would probably regard as a callous public extension of the offence, should be considered as an aggravating factor and reflected in the sentence passed on him.
Calls to limit defendant's rights in such cases must be viewed with caution, but this option at least offers the opportunity to punish appropriately and create a precedent which might cause future sex offenders brought to trial to consider that the best interests of their victims might in fact be their own.
PETER KELLY
London E8
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments