LETTER: Sensitive smells

Christopher M. Rogers
Wednesday 17 January 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Christopher M. Rogers

Sir: There is a precedent for sensors that detect human smell ("Security sensors sniff out potential intruders", 15 January): the Americans dropped similar devices during the Vietnam war to detect guerrilla movements. Unfortunately for the Americans, the Viet Cong found that the detectors could be fooled simply by hanging containers of urine from the trees, and the scheme was not a success.

Let us hope the new devices do not suffer a similar fate, or it could make security guards' jobs even more unpleasant.

Yours faithfully,

Christopher M. Rogers

Edgware, Middlesex

15 January

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in