Letter: Send paedophiles to island exile

David Burton
Monday 03 March 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: No real attempt seems to have been made to resolve the conflict between minimising risks to children and the right of ex-offenders to live in peace and freedom having served their sentences ("Paedophile lists prompt mob attacks", 24 February).

The present trend of "outing" paedophiles gives any gang of vigilantes an excuse to attack those who are often weak and inadequate, terrorising them into changing their identity and being lost to police or probation surveillance. There have also been cases of mistaken identity, where people with no known involvement with child abuse have been attacked.

A large proportion of paedophiles are unable to control their obsession and, despite treatment in prison, continue on release to insinuate themselves into situations where they can reoffend. In this they differ from burglars, fraudsters, drug-peddlers and shoplifters only in the nature of their offence.

Could not the concept of internal exile be explored for convicted paedophiles considered unlikely to change their sexual preferences? An island or peninsula large enough to accommodate a self-supporting community could be set aside in which such people could be required to spend the rest of their lives, in return for shorter or suspended sentences.

They would have all the freedoms of open society except that they would be forbidden to return to any area inhabited by children under a determined age. Special security arrangements would be made to ensure that the exile was not broken.

I suspect that the cost of setting up such a system would be considerably less than that of imprisonment, surveillance, reoffending and re-imprisonment.

DAVID BURTON

Telford, Shropshire

The author was Head of Education at Wandsworth Prison, 1990-1996

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in