Letter: Self-interested motives for Western aid to Russia
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: To imply, as Jonathan Eyal does (Comment, 20 December), that the West used to be having a starry-eyed love affair with Russia, which should now be tempered by self-interest, is absurd. The West, justifiably, is always propelled by basic drives - security and profit- taking (genteel or ruthless). When the motives for 'helping' Russia were different, they were actually nastier (West Germans smugly sending food packages to paupers in Russia).
The West does not (and perhaps should not) like any and all election results just because an election has been held democratically. When the outcome of an election is disagreeable (in terms of trade or moral conceit), the political and journalistic West is happy to look the other way as the army, as in Algiers, quashes the unwelcome winners (Muslim fundamentalists).
More important is Mr Eyal's fudging over whether or not Russia has a right to protect ethnic Russians in the newly independent adjoining states. Parents of such Russians may have gone, or been forced to go, to Estonia or Maldova for all the unsavoury Soviet reasons. But these Russians have been receiving a raw deal, and most people find forced mass repatriation (a la Bulgaria of Turks) ethnically repugnant. So why the facile comparison only to Hitler and the Sudeten Germans when, in fact, Northern Ireland, the Falklands, Grenada and Cyprus come as readily to mind?
Sincerely,
VLADIMIR KONECNI
Amsterdam
22 December
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments