Letter: Self-governing 'solution' will encourage violence in South Africa
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In favouring the idea that 'regional, ethnic and tribal differences' in South Africa make it imperative for that country to be divided into 'self-governing nations' to avoid a 'powder keg that is sure to explode', both Richard Dowden (22 March) and Mark Morton (Letters, 26 March) seem unaware that that is exactly what was proposed by a leading South African in the Seventies. President B. J. Vorster said that when his regime's plans for a 'constellation of self-governing national states' in South Africa had reached fruition, 'the justification of apartheid will be complete'. These 'states' were the alleged 'homelands'.
Generations of white autocracy in South Africa have created mass migrations, tribal regrouping, inter-marriage and other complexities among black South Africans. Add the fact that the black 'homelands', including Kwazulu, are either fictions, or eroded white inventions, and what is really likely to cause explosions, as both Bophuthatswana and Ciskei have already shown, is this belief that omelettes can be unscrambled by legislation. Apartness hasn't worked, on any scale.
The Rev Morton's claim that F. W. de Klerk has been 'successfully wooed by Nelson Mandela' to reject the 'self-governing nations' solution, is to misunderstand the facts. Mr Mandela failed to get his concept of a properly unitary South Africa accepted, while Mr de Klerk has continued to fund the discredited 'separate states' or alleged 'homelands', a system long denounced by Mr Mandela.
Yours sincerely,
LEN CLARKE
Uxbridge, Middlesex
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments