Letter: Seeking a radical approach to lifelong learning
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: As a parent, I was interested and encouraged to read Sir Claus Moser's sensible article in which he advocates improvements in four areas as priorities.
I was disappointed, however, in some of his views about secondary education. I doubt that pupils, recently relieved of the burden of pursuing large numbers of subjects to examination standard for GCSE, would welcome his advocacy of "replacing A-levels with a truly broad and flexible examination".
A-levels represent their first opportunity to focus on a small number of areas in greater depth, and one of the advances noticed by parents of my generation is that pupils can now choose a mixture of subjects they enjoy and think they can excel in rather than conventional groups of sciences, languages or arts. At the same time, small and diverse modules can be taken without the restriction of passing exams.
I was also disturbed by Sir Claus's continuing infatuation with the universal comprehensive school. Parents have been demonstrating for decades their commitment to good secondary education; and this is not just the parents of the 8 per cent who opt for independent schools, but the unknown but large number who choose where they live having established in advance that the local state schools are of a high standard. They do not wish to see destructive levelling out by imposition of a single style of school and many are unconvinced of the evils of selection.
There must be a recognition of the fact that there are different problems in different geographical areas, and that, contrary to Gillian Shephard's assertions, resources are all important. Schools with more problem children should be helped by allocation of larger budgets, enabling smaller class sizes and higher quality teachers.
Dr Mark Wansbrough-Jones
London SE19
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments