Letter: Seeds of peril in genetically altered food
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The Liberal Democrats are keen to embrace new and appropriate technology ("Nothing to fear from techno-corn", 11 December). However, we take issue with the assertion that "if a technology turns out to be a loser, we are also capable of rejecting it." When manipulating genetic structures it is not always possible to turn back the clock. This requires that we have stringent regulation in place.
Public unease can only increase when faced with the apparent ability of multinational food and chemical companies to foreclose the options even before governments and their regulatory authorities are aware of the possible long-term implications. This is a classic case of the public watchdogs noticing the empty stable only once the horse has long since bolted.
Furthermore, without separate supply mechanisms by which the genetically modified product is distinguishable, how is it possible to trace the source of any potential problem? Such a system also makes comprehensive labelling a more viable option. Linked to this is the need for investment in research and monitoring of the long-term effects of genetically manipulated organisms.
On an issue as fundamental as the food we eat, the consumer deserves a cautious and considered approach - not one driven by commercial interests alone.
MATTHEW TAYLOR MP
(Truro, Lib Dem)
Liberal Democrat Environment Spokesperson
PAUL TYLER MP
(North Cornwall, Lib Dem)
Liberal Democrat Agriculture and Rural Affairs Spokesperson
House of Commons
London SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments