Letter: Secure travel industry needs government monitoring
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your leading article (28 July), in its assertions of insufficient information and inadequate regulation, goes from the particular (Land Travel) to the general without a convincing chain of logic. So far as charter holidays by air are concerned, there is a legal obligation for companies in this business to hold an Air Travel Organiser's Licence (Atol) and for them to state in their brochures that they have one. Leaflets published by, among others, the Civil Aviation Authority, make clear what this means in terms of protecting passengers from the effects of financial failure.
Thus for charter holidays by air - and these constitute the greater part of the market - the EC directive on package travel is already fully implemented and passengers travelling with a company under a CAA-issued Atol need have no fear of being stranded abroad or of financial loss due to that company's failure. As you report, the customers of the failed Bob Warren Travel Service are having repatriation arranged or full refunds without any additional cost to themselves.
The CAA, while ensuring that this protection exists, does not attempt to regulate competition between Atol holders. The vigour of this condition is one of the best forms of protection that the holidaymaker can have but, because of the Atol system, it is not at the expense of his rights if the travel company fails financially.
Yours faithfully,
CHRISTOPHER CHATAWAY
Chairman
CAA: Civil Aviation Authority
London, WC2
28 July
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments