Letter: Secrets of the Greenwich dome

David Robertson
Thursday 26 June 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Louis Hellman (Letters, 26 June) has difficulty identifying the "symbolic significance" of Richard Rogers' breathtaking Millennium Dome.

The answer is that this project is the most dramatic - and I suspect also the biggest - manifestation of a range of exciting developments in materials technology and structural engineering, many of which have been pioneered in Britain. These developments - combining hi-tech fabrics and tensioned constructional forms - make possible the creation of large, light, flexible structures that are dramatic in appearance; contain huge, uncluttered spaces; can be built relatively quickly; and may be altered if tastes or requirements change over time.

Other notable examples include buildings by Michael Hopkins such as his wonderful Mound Stand at Lord's cricket ground, the Schlumberger Research Laboratory near Cambridge, the new Inland Revenue building in Nottingham and the Glyndebourne Opera House.

The dome of St Paul's Cathedral and the Dome of Discovery at the Festival of Britain were both important innovations of their own time which exploited the techniques and materials then available to architects. The former took 35 years to build: the latter, for the record, is said to have leaked.

If Mr Hellman seeks a one-word answer to his rhetorical question it is "progress" - something of which any sensible nation would be proud.

DAVID ROBERTSON

Technology Response Ltd

West Malvern,

Worcestershire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in