Letter: Secret swoop on accused Serbs

James Velusie
Tuesday 15 July 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Secret swoop on accused Serbs

Sir: Bill Woodger (letters, 14 July) obviously does not understand the complexities of arresting alleged war criminals if he is questioning the need for secrecy of indictments issued against Bosnian Serbs. The arrest of Kovacevic might well not have been possible had it not been

for the sealed indictment.

Sadly, the chances of the "big fish" being arrested are very slim, despite Nato getting its act together. The chances of arresting Karadzic and Mladic are not helped by the publicised warrants for their arrest, as is the case with another 70 or so. By issuing secret indictments there is less chance of the suspects surrounding themselves with hundreds of bodyguards, thus preventing any kind of arrest - as Karadzic has done.

As regards SAS tactics, it would not have mattered who went to arrest Drljaca: it could have been the Metropolitan Police firearms unit; the result would have been the same. Or does Mr Woodger think it acceptable for a person nearly to kill another for simply issuing a verbal challenge?

JAMES VELUSIE

Nottingham

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in