Letter: Sea Empress disaster: why did it happen? what are the lessons to be learnt?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sea Empress disaster: why did it happen? what are the lessons to be learnt?
From Mr Kevin Shilleto
Sir: Whether the Sea Empress drama is brought to a relatively damage- free conclusion or not, this case highlights once again the dangers inherent in trying to run oil transportation by sea on the cheap.
Since the oil crisis of 1973-74, the international oil industry has been able to dictate freight conditions to tanker owners and has invariably opted to force the latter to cut operational corners. Meantime, international safety regulations have been vastly extended, some of them containing a cost element for shipowners.
As a result, replacement of old, unreliable vessels has dwindled to the point where sheer fleet age is going to increase the frequency of pollution scenarios. Building and operating a double-hull VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier) costs at least 20 per cent more than a similar single hull vessel but oil companies will not pay the premium. So shipowners will not build them.
Oil companies do not themselves own tankers, as they once did, because shipping is no longer regarded as a "core" activity (ie it does not make any money). Whose fault is that?
Perhaps it is time the supermarkets, already commanding 25 per cent of the UK petrol market (and 40 per cent in France), got into refining and transportation as well. At least they know when to take products dangerous to the public off their shelves.
Yours faithfully,
Kevin Shilleto
Director, Internaft
London, SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments