Letter: Scots, English and a leap in the dark
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In your report "Tories threaten to make the Scots pay up" (11 February) you refer to Conservative propaganda that there is more "identifiable" government spending per head in Scotland than in England, with the implication that this is some sort of "benefit" bestowed on the Scots by virtue of the Union.
A more accurate picture will be obtained if revenue raising is also considered. Last month the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, William Waldegrave, admitted in a parliamentary written answer that, taking oil revenues into account, Scotland has paid a massive pounds 27bn absolute surplus into the London Treasury since 1979. This the equivalent of pounds 5,400 for every person in Scotland.
JOE TAYLOR
Brighton, East Sussex
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments