Letter: Science should glory in its limitations
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Science should glory in its limitations
Sir: In his article introducing Science Week (18 March) Tom Wilkie tells us that the importance of trying to understand science for the non-specialist is "simply that science provides a profoundly satisfying way of looking at and making sense of the world in which we live". Surely, on the contrary, it is profoundly unsatisfying on that score, despite its telling us that the world is "not all arbitrary and chaotic".
Science assists us not one whit in understanding all that distinguishes us as human beings. It tells us a deal about the machinery by which nature functions, but this hardly qualifies it for the description "profound". As William Hartston pointed out in his piece on coma patients (12 March), even the understanding of the physical basis, within the brain, of consciousness itself "still seems a very long way off indeed".
What does it tell us about disinterested love; of our essential need for artistic expression, be it in words, line, colour, form, movement or sound, and the beauty in these forms of expression? What of the need for moral precepts, dealing with the ideas of good and evil, by which the societies in which we live may be viable? And what, perhaps above all, of what Jung described as being autochthonous - man's sense of the religious?
Perhaps the value of so much of the truly marvellous discoveries of modern science, in its own field, lies in the fact that we become aware of the inability of the scientific disciplines to help us in solving our profoundest questions, which concern the nature of Man, and his destiny.
John Danser
Penarth, South Glamorgan
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments