LETTER:Schools of thought about gifted young
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Prof Michael J. A. Howe
Sir: It is not true that the creative achievements of geniuses like Darwin and Einstein depended on inborn talents which their parents and teachers failed to recognise ("IQ", 26 August).
Many of our greatest thinkers have been genuinely ordinary as children. The proposal to warn young people with low intelligence-test scores not to expect too much out of life is dangerous nonsense: had such a view been heeded in the past, the enormous contributions of Michael Faraday, George Stephenson, Charlotte Bronte and Anthony Trollope would have been denied us, as well as Darwin's.
As an explanation, the myth that inborn talents are the cause of exceptional achievements belongs with witches' covens and flying saucers. Sadly, it is not just an innocent fiction, because teachers' beliefs in illusory innate gifts result in youngsters who are thought to lack them being denied the help and encouragement that every successful person depends upon.
There is nothing wrong with helping children who have made a good start in life to go on extending their capabilities, but labelling young people in ways which falsely imply that their future achievements can be foretold does far more harm than good.
Yours sincerely,
Michael Howe
Department of Psychology
University of Exeter
Exeter
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments