Letter: School funded opt-out fight
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.FRAN ABRAMS voices the misgivings surrounding the use of public money to influence parents to vote for grant maintained status for their children's schools ('Taxpayers funded Tory plan for schools', 6 February). The government-funded Grant Maintained Schools Centre would not be alone if it were confirmed that it had been influencing parents in this way. Money provided by the taxpayer has probably been used in every 'opting-out' ballot initiated by a school governing body: it most certainly was in my son's school. In that (unsuccessful) case, governors appropriated school funds to produce literature encouraging an opt-out vote, which meant that parents wishing for a more balanced debate had to pay for that debate from their own resources. Questioned about the legitimacy of this, the Department for Education asserted that governors could use school resources in any way they wished.
Clive Upton
Ilkley, West Yorkshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments