Letter: Saving water: meters, permits, tankers and shared baths

Mr David Bardega
Monday 04 September 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr David Bardega

Sir: I must be one of the few people who has some sympathy for the water companies which continue to maintain supplies as this prolonged period of hot weather, together with minimal rainfall, draws to a close.

The sprinkler, or garden irrigation system, can consume water at the rate of one cubic metre (approximately 220 gallons) per hour. Where the customer is unmetered, the water company may make an additional fixed charge for the use of a sprinkler, irrespective of any change in normal weather conditions. My own experience to date, within the Thames Water area, suggests that a significant proportion of all customers make no disclosure with regard to the use of sprinklers and are therefore not being charged for this element of service. Unmetered customers who are paying the sprinkler charge may be paying only a fraction of the true cost for this service.

I would suggest that talk of compensation is misplaced and that the present sorry state of affairs arises from the many anomalies thrown up by a system of charging for a service which, for the most part, is unrelated to consumption.

Yours faithfully,

David Bardega

London, NW1

30 August

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in