Letter: Save our museums

Ian Lawley
Saturday 11 December 1999 20:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

AT LAST a museum story grabs the headlines ("Labour to ditch free museum promise", 5 December). A pity, then, that your writers collude in the metrocentric view that museums begin and end in London. There never was a promise of "universal free admission to the nation's museums and galleries". Despite a clever spin, the government's pledge relates solely to the national museums, offering nothing to the wider community.

Yet again, in terms of public debate and media coverage, the interests of the majority of museums are overshadowed by those of the nationals. There is an important debate to be had about the future of museums, but the admission charges at the nationals have little to do with it. The recently launched Designation Challenge Fund, which offers support for "pre-eminent"collections, is a step in the right direction but only benefits a small number of museums.

Museums across the country add enormous value to the lives of communities. Their collections are as much a part of the nation's heritage as anything in London, and they attract more visitors than the nationals. They make an important contribution to social, cultural and economic regeneration, yet their effectiveness is consistently underestimated.

Museums are trying to reconcile their commitments with year-on-year budget cuts; an increasing number have been driven by revenue constraints to make admission charges and have seen visitor levels fall. If the nationals do not want the money on offer, fine. This provides other museums with the chance to benefit the sector as a whole. A stabilisation programme would allow us to address the long-standing problems.

IAN LAWLEY

Group for Museum Directors

Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in