Letter: Sanctions hit Iraqis but help Saddam
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Eric Berman (letter, 25 January) may be director of UN Watch, but he cannot have read the recent reports of the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation, the World Health Organisation and Unicef on the continuing effect of sanctions on the Iraqi population.
To argue that the UN Security Council has acted "with humane understanding" is injudicious. The criteria for the lifting of sanctions have repeatedly changed, and this has resulted in their prolongation for six-and-a-half years. In this period, 750,000 people have perished through lack of medicines and malnutrition.
Mr Berman is mistaken in assuming that the partial lifting of sanctions currently under way will bring notable improvement. Only $1.06bn of the food-for-oil revenue over a six-month period can go on food and medical supplies. For the 18 million Iraqis under government rule, this amounts to $9 per person per month. Before the Gulf crisis, Iraq imported two- thirds of its food; a recent UN report found Iraq would need $2.2bn every six months just to feed its population.
Even more serious is the fact that only $17m may go on essential infrastructure, such as chemicals for sewage treatment or parts for water pumping equipment. Most of the child deaths since August 1990 have been due to the inadequate sanitation system left after Allied bombings during the Gulf war. Mr Berman blames the continuation of sanctions on the refusal of the Iraqi leadership to destroy all the weapons the Security Council demands. However, international law is not made at the behest of the Security Council, and the states of the world did not sign up to a global tyranny. The powers of the Security Council were conferred upon it by the Charter of the UN, which recognises in Article 51 the "inherent" right of states to possess weapons.
GLEN RANGWALA
Durham
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments