Letter: Salisbury wants less congestion and if that means a bypass, then we must have it

Saturday 20 July 1996 18:02 EDT

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Robert Key is wrong in claiming that he has the backing of Salisbury district council for the proposed A36 Salisbury bypass. On Monday, the council agreed by a majority of 35 to 17 to request the Secretary of State to re-open the public inquiry into the bypass, in light of new information relating to its environmental impact.

Indira Nath

Salisbury, Wiltshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Letter: Salisbury wants less congestion and if that means a bypass, then we must have it

Join our commenting forum

Thank you for registering