Letter: Safety at Thorp
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Peter Taylor's article 'An entirely credible catastrophe' (Science, 1 November) stretches credibility to the limit. In the event of a power failure to the Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (Thorp) at Sellafield, there would be no release of activity, even if no action was taken to rectify the situation for a considerable time. Of course, action would be taken. Thorp is not dependent upon hi-tech safety devices to prevent the boiling of liquids in the plant. Not surprisingly, though, the plant is well supplied with alternative supplies of electricity.
The operation of Thorp will obviously influence the volume of liquid waste awaiting vitrification on the Sellafield site. However, contrary to the impression given by Mr Taylor, preventing the operation of Thorp would not materially alter the current storage arrangements on site.
Yours sincerely,
DAVID BONSER
Director, Thorp Division
British Nuclear Fuels
Warrington, Cheshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments