Letter: Safeguards on patenting of genes

Alistair Kent
Monday 14 July 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Wendy Watson ("The body in question is mine",10 July) is worried that, if the directive on gene patenting to be debated in the European Parliament this week is passed it will lead to patenting of body parts. This is not the case. The directive would expressly prohibit such a situation.

The Legal Affairs Committee voted overwhelmingly for an amendment which states: "The human body, at the various stages of formation and development, and the simple discovery of one of its elements including the sequence or partial sequence of a gene cannot constitute patentable inventions."

This is a significant clarification over the present position, under which it is perfectly possible that the scenario that she envisages will come about. Those who are worried about the possible commercialisation of genetics should be lobbying hard to see the directive in place. The European Parliament's proposals will put in place valuable safeguards - including an ethical committee charged with ensuring appropriate application of scientific advances for the benefit of human health, and a restriction on the scope of patentable inventions to exclude, for example, patents involving human embryos, which would be potentially patentable under existing European patent law.

Whether or not Myriad genetics is granted a patent on the BRCA 1 gene will be determined by application of existing statute. Even if it is, the price that it is able to charge will not be entirely a matter of its own choosing. Unlike the situation in the US, where a free market applies, pharmaceutical prices are negotiated by the Department of Health with the pharmaceutical industry. Efforts to ensure that genetic tests developed by commercial companies are available to those who need them at a price that the NHS can afford are therefore better directed at the Department of Health, whether or not the European Parliament votes for the directive on Tuesday.

ALASTAIR KENT

Director

Genetic Interest Group

London EC1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in