Letter: Safeguards in euthanasia
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I FULLY understand Michael Platt's concern that legislation for voluntary euthanasia may mean a patient asking for release "in a moment of extreme pain or deep depression" (Letters, 28 January). This is why it is vital to include in safeguards a period of reflection by the patient so that the request is fully considered and stable. Such safeguards have been included in legislation introduced in Oregon and the Northern Territories of Australia. Provision has also been made for a psychiatric assessment should clinical depression be suspected.
However, patients are the final arbiters about the quality of their lives and they should have autonomy even at the very end.
John Oliver
The Voluntary Euthanasia Society, London W8
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments