Letter: Safe streets mean private sacrifice
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: So Tom Wilkie disagrees with the Criminal Justice Bill's proposal to allow the police to take samples from suspects for DNA analysis ('A criminal waste of gene genius', 21 March). This may be an intrusion into personal privacy, but the price of not doing so is greater.
The alternative to using DNA samples is fewer rapists being caught. DNA evidence cannot lead to miscarriages of justice, as laboratory errors produce only mismatches between the crime scene's and defendant's DNA, thus favouring the defendant in every case. The first time genetic fingerprinting was used, the defendant's 'confession' was quashed and the real murderer was later caught as a result. If we want safer streets, sacrificing a little privacy is a small price to pay.
Yours faithfully,
MARK SAMUELS
London, E3
21 March
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments