Letter: Sacrificial offer of UK nuclear missiles
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: According to secret cabinet papers, just released under the 30-year rule, Britain offered to scrap its nuclear missiles at the height of the 1962 Cuban missile crisis to allow the Soviets to save face. At that time, as today, the British government publicly insisted on the necessity of our possession of an 'independent' nuclear deterrent. If Britain could offer to sacrifice its nuclear weapons in 1962, when the world stood on the brink of nuclear war, why cannot we make a similar sacrifice today?
The threat of nuclear war has subsided to such an extent that the United States and Russia are proposing to reduce their nuclear stockpiles by significant amounts. Yet Britain has announced that it still intends to increase sixfold the firepower of its nuclear deterrent.
Surely the only sane explanation for this apparent irrationality is that Britain is secretly proposing to scrap Trident.
Let us hope that we shall not have to wait another 30 years before we hear about this.
Yours etc,
SHEILA JONES
London, NW3
1 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments