Letter: Saatchi's appropriation of art
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your headline story this morning ('Saatchi's bulk purchase puts artist on map') will leave an unsavoury taste in the mouth of artists and people who care about art. The implication is that a bulk purchase by Charles Saatchi is an event: the years of slog that went into making the art itself is of marginal relevance. Dalya Alberge does not describe the work of Simon Callery, or explore his intentions. It is as if Mr Saatchi is an appropriation artist, and the people he collects are simply found objects.
I would guess the exhibition, which it is reported was bought in its entirety for pounds 20,000, represents two years' work by Mr Callery. After gallery commission and materials, the artist will probably get a quarter of that sum. Mr Saatchi, on the other hand, has in effect bought himself and his company the prime spot on your front page for the price of a small ad - and he gets to take home some art.
In my opinion, Callery fully deserves a wider audience for his sensitive and thoughtful paintings; but far from 'putting him on the map', inclusion in the Saatchi Collection is a serious professional stigma. People who might otherwise have been generous in their sentiments will ask what it is about him that appeals to the shock-, glamour- and gimmick- conscious advertising mogul. Being in the Saatchi Collection is almost as damaging to the reputation of a young artist as being shortlisted for the Turner Prize.
Yours faithfully,
DAVID COHEN
London, NW3
5 March
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments