Letter: Runway capacity at Heathrow

Sir Michael Bishop
Friday 17 July 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I have some sympathy for Richard Branson and Virgin Atlantic (Commentary, 16 July) in their difficulty over obtaining an ideal portfolio of landing and take-off slots for a new London Heathrow-Johannesburg service. However, their problem is neither new, nor a special case. On many new routes, my own airline, British Midland, initially had to make do with schedules which were far from ideal in order to realise our own ambition to provide additional competitive European services.

In fact, it could be argued that with the welcome entry of new airlines into Heathrow last year, including Virgin Atlantic, competition on long-haul routes has never been so healthy or intense, with the lowest fares ever available to the consumer. On European routes, by contrast, which repeated opinion surveys show are of most critical interest to travellers, competition continues to be stifled because of the shortage of Heathrow slots.

At British Midland, we have had to take a pragmatic view of this problem. We recognise that the Heathrow Scheduling Committee has a most difficult task in allocating a scarce resource. On the whole, it succeeds in discharging this responsibility with great fairness to the interests of all airlines operating at Heathrow. We have not allowed scheduling problems to deflect us from the successful operation of new European services, although often we have had to work hard over a number of years to improve our slot allocation. I would urge Mr Branson to adopt the same practical approach.

As members of the most successful multi-airline industry in the world, British airlines ought to recognise that they do have a common interest, whatever their own particular ambitions.

British Midland has provided constructive proposals to the Secretary of State on the measures - many of them short term, practical and inexpensive - he can take to achieve the much-needed additional runway capacity at Heathrow. They are for the benefit, pro rata, of all airlines using the airport, and we would therefore urge support of them by all Heathrow carriers.

Yours faithfully,

MICHAEL BISHOP

Chairman

British Midland

Castle Donington, Leicestershire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in