Letter: Round and round the round table
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Without John Hume's courage and persistence, there would have been no ceasefire in Northern Ireland, so we all owe him a great deal. But he is wrong to insist on yet another roundtable between the parties ("It's good to talk, Mr Major", 15 November).
Once he brought Sinn Fein into the process, he created conditions which made an Irish settlement only possible by bilateral negotiations between the two sovereign governments.
It is not just that the Unionists will not sit down with - as they see it - a gun pointed at their heads, but that even if they accepted John Hume's arguments, they would have to make the settlement stick with all those Unionists who argued, when it came to a referendum, that a treaty agreed under threat of force was not binding.
By agreeing that the next step is yet another round table, the British Government is now predictably boxed in by the incompatible preconditions laid down by Sinn Fein and the Unionists.
And for what? The last round table was a disaster and there is no reason to suppose that a new one would be any better.
The two governments have already achieved an agreed position. They each need to negotiate bilaterally with the parties who look to them and then with each other; and IRA arms and British troops can now be part of that negotiation.
At some point they must persuade the parties who look to them that they have got the best deal they can.
Then, and only then, should they bring them round a table, pen in hand, to sign the settlement.
Yours faithfully,
Fred Catherwood
Cambridge
15 November
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments