Letter: Role of the Fine Arts Commission
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Jonathan Glancey's article on the problems facing the RFAC gave the wholly misleading impression that it is only that body which can make aesthetic judgement on development proposals.
He should be aware that all local planning authorities are under an instruction in PPG1 from central government to "reject obviously poor designs out of scale or character with their surroundings". If this does not involve aesthetic judgements, I do not know what does. The distinct advantage that local authorities have is that, unlike Lord Fawsley's committee of the great and the good, they have been elected by local communities to represent their interests.
I can assure him that this practice is thriving and forming an invaluable role in the protection of our built environment, so much of which has been ravaged in the past by developments blessed by the RFAC.
TONY TUGNUTT
London WC1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments