Letter: ROH budgets
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ROH budgets
Sir: The allegation that the board of the Royal Opera House never received financial information which enabled it to assess its trading position or take action on it is totally untrue (Andreas Whittam Smith, 9 December). It is also false that financial forecasts were "left on the shelf while planning proceeded willy-nilly without reference to them".
During my chairmanship (and that of my predecessor) the board received monthly financial statements which showed up-to-date projections of the profit and loss account, with movements indicated month by month and for the full year. Adverse changes against budget were accompanied by management recommendations for action to correct or reverse such trends. These included wage restraint, cuts in overheads and, during 1996, redundancies. Production schedules were examined and if necessary adjusted; box office results and cash flow were also reviewed. All these matters received the board's close attention.
Whatever our faults of omission or commission, the serious charge that we had no proper financial information to guide us is not only a false reflection on the board, but a slur on the able and hard-working staff who provided it.
Sir ANGUS STIRLING
London W11
The writer was chairman of the Royal Opera House, 1991-96
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments