Letter: Robinson is innocent
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your heading "Robinson censured by MPs" (21 January) is inaccurate. The decision on Geoffrey Robinson's involvement in the Orion Trust by both the Parliamentary Commissioner, Sir Gordon Downey, and the Standards and Privileges Committee, of which I am a member, was that there was no breach of the rules. How can you interpret a "not guilty" verdict as a censure?
The committee did however take the view that to be on the safe side members generally (including Mr Robinson) would be wise to take Sir Gordon's advice when possible interests in trusts arise. I believe the committee's guidance, if followed, should assist all members in avoiding unfounded criticism in the future.
MICHAEL FOSTER MP
(Hastings and Rye, Lab)
House of Commons
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments