Letter: Reviving the NHS
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Reviving the NHS
Sir: With NHS waiting lists rising again (report, 18 November), last week's unveiling of the Government's plans for transferring secondary healthcare purchasing to GP collectives prompted another airing of your belief that the internal market has provided a "lever to efficiency" in the NHS (leader, 12 November). If this were true, any benefits have been squandered by the extravagant contractual paper chase inherent in the purchaser/provider split.
The longer-term contracts proposed should reduce bureaucracy and there is a slim hope that GP collectives will prove more sensitive than health authority officials in judging priorities in hospital practice. However, the fundamental flaw in the contractual approach to hospital funding will remain: over-performance is anathema and trusts invariably strive to do the minimum for their allotted income. By this time of year, a large proportion of surgical teams are under instruction not to treat waiting-list patients covered by completed health authority contracts or by the increasing proportion of impecunious GP fundholders. These restrictions apply irrespective of spare capacity and the knowledge that 70 per cent of NHS spending is consumed by salaries, so that the cost of treating additional patients in terms of drugs and disposables is relatively small.
Before 1990, the ethos of NHS hospitals was to undertake as much activity as possible within a fixed budgetary allocation. The challenge to the Health Secretary is to revive this simple concept alongside rigorous resource management and performance monitoring. The information systems necessary for analysis of activity and outcome are in place. A national inspectorate ("Offsick"?) could set standards and should be able to reward excellence or improvement with modest financial incentives in the form of development grants.
MALCOLM SIMMS
Consultant Surgeon
Selly Oak Hospital
Birmingham
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments