LETTER:Results of the Oxbridge tutorial system
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Dr R. H. S. Carpenter
Sir: One form of subsidy not mentioned in your articles and leader on Oxbridge tutorials (13 June) is the very substantial one provided by those who are doing the teaching. At about the time that most people are packing up and going home, we embark on a further two hours of intensive and demanding work, for which - including the time required to read and correct the work the students have prepared for the supervision - we receive some pounds 12 per hour.
Why are we willing to do this? Because we believe that a university education is not vocational training. We are not programming our students for adequacy in some pre-determined job; we are developing in them the qualities they need to be leaders and innovators in whatever field they choose to enter, and this cannot be done by mass production. We aim to cultivate their imagination and creativity, their critical and analytical powers, their desire to get to the roots of things, to think widely rather than narrowly, and to express themselves effectively so that they may convince others of what they believe; in sum, to develop and use their full intellectual faculties. They also learn to work.
In addition to a heavy load of lectures and practical classes, a medical student at Cambridge will typically have three or four supervisions a week, for each of which an essay or other written work is expected; at most universities, three essays a term is nearer the mark.
Over the last decade, this Government has tried to appear to be increasing the provision of "university" education, partly by renaming institutions whose functions are quite different, and partly by encouraging the adoption of cheap and cheerful assembly-line methods by which a suitable tamed and unquestioning workforce can be created at minimum expense to the tax- payer. There may be economic reasons for doing this; but let us not pretend that it is educationally desirable.
Rather than advocating, as you appear to do, the levelling down of tertiary education, why not campaign instead for all universities to be adequately funded so that they may offer to every student who may benefit from it a genuine university education?
Yours,
R. H. S. CARPENTER
Director of Medical Studies
Gonville and Caius College
Cambridge
13 June
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments