Letter: Research into alternative medicine is alive and well

Peta Trousdell
Saturday 30 November 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Emma Brooker says: "Health-Watch defines itself as `pro- science' and aims to dispel the miasma of woolly thinking and half-truth which, it claims, hangs over the world of alternative health".

Perhaps HealthWatch should take heed of the British Medical Journal of October 1991 in which it was recorded that 85 per cent of medical procedures are scientifically unproven. Not to mention that the pharmaceutical companies who fund most research in this country may be biased and have a vested interest in promoting their products.

I suggest that HealthWatch contacts the Research Council for Complementary Medicine in order to access a plethora of research. Reputable complementary practitioners are fully qualified and accredited and aim to promote safety and efficacy in their practices. However, there are good, bad and indifferent practitioners in both allopathic and complementary fields.

It is important that both complementary and allopathic practitioners are seen to be working within certain prescribed parameters in order to be taken seriously within the context of accepted methods of research discipline. It would also be useful if research funding was spread more equitably.

Peta Trousdell

Brighton, East Sussex

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in