Letter: Remember the 364 economists
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The Independent should be congratulated on its Forum for National Recovery, but are we about to see history repeat itself? Just as the 364 economists who wrote to the Times in 1981 calling for a radical change in economic policy managed to do so as output started to recover, recent shoots of recovery appear to be taking on a green tinge.
Retail sales have risen in seven of the last nine months, to be nearly 2 per cent higher than a year earlier. Car production is more than 20 per cent higher than a year earlier, while car registrations are 7 per cent higher on the same basis. All this has occurred against a background of falling house prices, rising unemployment, collapsing consumer confidence and a relentlessly gloomy media.
The risk now must be that the Government has stimulated the economy too much, and inflationary pressures will begin to build again, with Ford's planned price increases acting as a timely reminder. All this may appear far-
fetched, but as was (re)discovered as recently as 1988/89, when interest rates were raised, the lags between monetary policy and economic activity are long and variable. As a consequence, there is little chance that the easing in economic policy that has taken place since sterling's departure from the ERM has had any impact on activity. (Not that consumer demand needs a further stimulus, the problem appears to be lack of supply, as both the monthly trade statistics and Sir John Harvey-
Jones continue to highlight.)
As Nigel Lawson wrote in 1962, '. . . the Treasury has never done anything too soon. Its actions fall into two categories, too little too late and too much too late.' It would then be somewhat ironic if the same fate befalls the Independent as the 364 economists.
Yours faithfully,
ROB ELLIS
Petts Wood, Kent
10 December
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments