Letter: Regional variation in electric shock therapy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is given to some 20,000 people in the United Kingdom every year. About 70 per cent of them are women. Over 2,000 of them are detained, non-consenting patients.
Someone living in, for example, the East Anglian or Wessex regions is more than twice as likely to receive ECT as someone living in the Oxford or South Western regions. A psychiatric patient in East Suffolk is more than three times as likely to receive ECT as a psychiatric patient in other districts in the East Anglian region.
Hugh Freeman (Letters, 15 December) says there is nothing surprising about such differences since different psychiatrists 'have to deal with very varying groups of patients'. But why should patients vary so much from one part of the country to another, or from one town to the next?
Yours faithfully,
SUE KEMSLEY
Cambridge
18 December
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments