Letter: Reasons for the short supply of science students

Professor Peter Fellgett,Frs
Sunday 29 August 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: In order to understand the supply of science graduates and the demand for them, it is necessary to consider the direct as well as the indirect rewards of studying science.

The direct reward is satisfaction of the hunger to understand the physical universe and how it works. One of the Huxleys, I believe it was, remarked that Nature is not only more wonderful than we imagine, it is more wonderful than we can imagine. In this sense, science is the most abstract and arguably the greatest of art forms. Aesthetically a scientist is someone who has understood this.

The mistake many people make is to look for the pleasure-mechanism too soon. In science one cannot just read, look or listen and say, 'Oh, how beautiful'; the pleasure comes from having solved a problem, or in the accurate and imaginative thinking needed to find a solution.

As to the indirect, material rewards of studying science, in a society that rewards those who manipulate wealth more highly than those who create it, it is no wonder that employers undervalue scientists. Undesirable though this circumstance is, it at least has the virtue that it makes the study of science less attractive to those who do not truly love it.

Yours faithfully,

PETER FELLGETT

Bodmin, Cornwall

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in