Letter: Radiation safety needs tightening

Mr Gerald Clark
Wednesday 11 May 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The article by Tom Wilkie 'Industrial x-ray workers at greater risk than nuclear staff' (9 May) was a timely reminder that other industries which use radiation sources are escaping adequate scrutiny because of public preoccupation with safety standards in the nuclear industry.

Health and safety standards in the nuclear industry are already extremely high, yet there is continuous pressure (not least from the media) to raise them further. This has helped to hide the fact that other industries may not be receiving enough attention from the regulators. This includes both industrial use of radiation, as in the tragic case that you reported, and broader questions of industrial safety.

The nuclear industry expects and welcomes tight regulation of its standards, and is rightly proud of its achievements in this field. Indeed, if the standards already being met by the nuclear industry were to be introduced more widely, it would lead to significant improvements in other industries.

Yours sincerely,

GERALD CLARK

Secretary General

The Uranium Institute

London, SW1

11 May

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in