LETTER:Questionable proof
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Jim Mangles
Sir: I'm afraid Pamma Baker Cassidy (Letters, 23 August) is in error when she claims to have "proved" that A-level and other examinations have not lowered their standards, on the ground that questions in the 1980s and 1990s are almost identical.
The prima facie case for standards having been lowered - namely, that despite far greater numbers of candidates coming forward, a much larger portion of them are gaining high grades - is a much stronger and more convincing "proof" for the contrary view. Surely it is not what is asked that determines the standard of an examination, but the way the answers are marked.
Your sincerely,
Jim Mangles
Diss, Norfolk
23 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments