Letter: Questionable arguments in support of opted-out schools

the Rev David Court
Friday 02 April 1993 17:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Having failed by argument and bribe to persuade schools to 'opt out', the Government should now 'intervene to push a sizeable majority into taking the plunge' (leading article, 31 March). So much for local democracy and freedom of choice.

Might it just not be that the majority of school governing bodies in this country, having considered the possibility of grant maintained status, have decided that the best interests of their pupils are served by remaining within the local education authority structure?

Yours faithfully,

DAVID COURT

Chairman of Governors

Barton Seagrave County

Primary School

Kettering,

Northamptonshire

31 March

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in