Letter: Quantifying the cost of statistics
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The articles and letters about UK government statistics published in the Independent in December had one striking omission: no one seemed to be much concerned about cost and the inevitable trade-off which must be faced between the cost and q uality of statistics.
To give one example, the availability of monthly results of acceptable reliability and accuracy from the Labour Force Survey might require a threefold increase in the present cost to the taxpayer, which is already several million pounds a year. Even if this assessment proved to be on the high side, substantial sums of additional public spending would be involved and the issue of whether this would be justified would have to be faced.
It is reassuring to know that these particular statistics are currently the subject of a study by the president, and two past presidents, of the Royal Statistical Society who, as good statisticians, will no doubt have this point very much in mind.
Yours faithfully, JACK HIBBERT Beckenham, Kent 5 January The writer was director, Central Statistical office, and head of Government Statistical Service, 1985-92.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments