Letter: Public support for Comic Relief

Stephen Lee
Tuesday 30 April 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Peter Popham (29 April) claims that Comic Relief is inefficient - "Oxfam raises four times more per year than Comic Relief's pounds 10m" - and that it "staggers on", raising less and less each year. The sum raised last year is actually pounds 20.8m, not pounds 10m. This represents an increase in income of 20 per cent from the previous event and both Oxfam and Save the Children Fund have, over the years, been the principal beneficiaries of funds raised by Comic Relief itself.

Under the Popham treatise, British giving remains "a peculiarly compulsive activity", undertaken in a "completely disinterested way, to whatever at any particular moment wrings our heartstrings the hardest". Indeed, giving is "one of the last unconscious hangovers from the glorious days of our empire".

But latest figures detailing income to the top 500 charities reveal that 33 per cent of total income comes from that most compulsive, immediate and disinterested of sources - the charitable bequest or legacy.

Who, or what, were the great fundraisers of the British Empire? Not Oxfam, Save the Children, nor the vast majority of public fundraising charities, all of which are a more modern phenomenon.

It is the advent of modern technology, and events like Comic Relief which harness that technology to the fundraising process, that have allowed a broader public the opportunity to support the causes they wish to.

Stephen Lee

Director

Institute of Charity

Fundraising Managers

London SW8

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in