Letter: Public morality in good health
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: You claim (30 November) that your poll with NOP backs a 'hard line on crime . . . and gives support for the tough stance of Michael Howard, the Home Secretary'. However, your reported results show equally overwhelming support for the view that a variety of social and economic factors, such as unemployment, poverty and poor housing, cause crime.
This has been consistently denied by the Government, which recognises only the holy trinity of tough panaceas: police, prisons and punishment. Right or wrong, the poll results are closer to Tony Blair's slogan 'Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime' than they are to Howard's way.
Yours sincerely,
ROBERT REINER
Professor of Criminology
The London School of
Economics and Political Science
London, WC2
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments