Letter: Psychology of the Rachel Nickell trial

Ms Wendy Lawson
Monday 19 September 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The fiasco of the Rachel Nickell murder trial ('Man freed as Nickell murder trial collapses', 15 September) has shown up faults both in the police investigation and in the Crown Prosecution Service's handling of the case. But behind both of these was the 'expert' on whose advice they were operating.

Paul Britton is an 'expert' psychologist. He led police to believe that he had enough insight into human behaviour to make meaningful predictions. In fact psychology is incapable of predicting behaviour with any accuracy at all. Most psychologists, even, would admit this.

As a result of the police's reliance on psychological 'profiling', either an innocent man has spent a year in prison, or a murderer has escaped justice because the prosecution case was too flawed to stand up in court. Either way a grave injustice has occurred and the cost in police and court time is immense.

Decades of psychological 'rehabilitation' in our prisons has meant that the vast majority of ex-prisoners reoffend. Psychology in our schools has led to increasing levels of basic illiteracy. When will the public authorities wake up to this history of no-results and consign this bogus science to the bin, where it belongs.

Yours faithfully,

WENDY LAWSON

Pangbourne,

Berkshire

16 September

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in