Letter: Profumo's story loses one of its secrets
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Why does officialdom find it necessary to delete the name of the man who, in February 1963, revealed the Profumo story to Harold Macmillan's private secretary, John Wyndham ('MI5 'failed to alert ministers over affair' ', 1 January)? Five years later, in 1968, Lord Egremont (as he had become) published his brief and witty memoirs, Wyndham and Children First. On page 187, he reveals that his informant was his old friend Mr Mark Chapman-Walker, managing director of the News of the World and formerly head of publicity at Conservative Central Office.
The Wyndham book also sheds light on the attitudes of MI5 at the time: after Chapman-Walker had left
We asked MI5 to send someone round. Someone duly arrived. From him we learnt that MI5 knew all about it. Profumo, he said, had certainly been in and out of Miss Keeler's place and people in authority had warned Mr Profumo against the association. They were sure, however, there had been no security risk. Why, we asked the man from MI5, why had we not been told about this before? 'This is a free country,' he replied, 'not a police state.'
DAVID HOLMES
Walpole, Suffolk
2 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments