Letter: Probation service: gesture politics, reoffending, the welfare r ole

Tom Rees
Thursday 19 January 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I have been a magistrate for 22 years, first in London, then in industrial Bedfordshire, latterly in rural Somerset. I am writing to express my despair at the undermining of sane and consistent penal policy and practice by the gesture politic s of our current Home Secretary. First, in the face of all the evidence, he proclaims that "prison works". Now we have more posturing; this time over probation orders and the probation service ("Probation to be scrapped for a tougher regime", 16 January)

.

Most probation officers are realistic, competent and committed. Of course there are a few woolly idealists, but they seldom last the course. Offenders put on probation by the courts are mostly young, poor, uneducated, unskilled, confused and aimless; a high proportion are unemployed. Their typical crimes are petty: minor theft and dishonesty, drink and drug offences, taking and driving cars.

Offenders like these must certainly expect some punishment for what they have done. But along with their punishment they often need help in sorting out their lives and engaging with society. Understanding what help to give and how best to give it in the context of a court order requires training in social and psychological skills and in the appropriate law. British Army discipline is fine in the Army where there is a unit for the miscreant to go back to and a strong institutional framework. Offenders onprobation do not have these things.

The short-term success rate of probation, widely reported, is high. One cannot blame probation officers for the fact that, once their involvement is finished, there are neither the jobs nor the social framework to encourage potential offenders to stick to the straight and narrow.

On these and related matters Mr Howard appears to reject informed advice and objective research findings whenever they clash with what he wishes to believe. This is the politics of the nursery. Where does it leave the magistrates, who are supposed to be administering consistent justice? Few among us, I suspect, would welcome a new role as managers of correctional programmes. Or does he hope that we too will be replaced by ex-Army sergeants and policemen?

Yours faithfully, TOM REES Stawell, Somerset 18 January

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in