Letter: Probability problem
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: You call for education in risk assessment to enable the nation to make up its own mind whether it is worth indulging in T-bone steak, rather than being dictated to by the "nanny state" (Letter from the Editor, 6 December).
The 1989 version of the national curriculum did include probability, starting from age seven with the meanings of more and less likely, certain and impossible. It was Sir Ron Dearing, then the chairman of the School Curriculum and Assessment Agency, who championed, and achieved, the postponement of probability ideas to the later years of primary school.
Far from following your suggestion, the present government are now urging that the teaching of probability be removed from primary schools altogether. Ministers have also declared their intention to ban calculators from schools. The "nanny state" clearly does not trust teachers to use them sensibly, any more than it trusts the public to select a sensible diet. Presumably the few hours saved from teaching about probability will now be needed for extra practice in calculator-free long division.
Isn't it time there was a more public debate about which mathematical ideas and skills are really "basic" in relation to the needs of the citizens of the next century?
MARGARET BROWN
Professor of Mathematics
Education
King's College, London
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments